AI writing risk report
ClearText turns a detector check into an AI-writing risk report: a practical summary of likely signals, risky sections, false-positive context, and revision next steps. Use it to guide review, not to claim certainty about authorship.
A useful AI-writing report should explain what looked risky, why the signal may be uncertain, and what a human reviewer should inspect next. ClearText focuses on reviewability: score context, language patterns, paragraph concerns, and suggested next steps.
A raw score can be misread as proof. A risk report makes uncertainty visible and documents the surrounding workflow: sample length, genre, editing level, sources, drafts, and author explanation.
Use the free detector for quick checks. Use the Pro workflow when longer drafts, saved history, and export-style reports become part of a school, team, or editorial process.
Output
ClearText risk report
Raw detector score
Decision support
Explains signals and next review steps
Easy to overinterpret
False-positive handling
Calls out context and uncertainty
Often left to the user
Workflow
Supports revision, documentation, and escalation
Ends at a number or label
Document why a draft needs review before taking action.
Explain AI-sounding sections to writers before publication.
Understand what to revise without chasing bypass tricks.
No. It is a structured review aid, not proof of authorship.
Review the text, sources, drafts, assignment fit, and author explanation before making decisions.
It can organize context and questions, but institutions or teams decide their own appeal process.
No. ClearText presents AI-writing signals with uncertainty and practical review guidance.